<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SmoothCam is smooth, but slow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/</link>
	<description>A few words about non-linear editing, filmmaking and more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Matsui Photography : Storytelling Multimedia from Seattle-Based Documentary, Photojournalism, Corporate, NGO, and Multimedia Photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-8550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Matsui Photography : Storytelling Multimedia from Seattle-Based Documentary, Photojournalism, Corporate, NGO, and Multimedia Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-8550</guid>
		<description>[...] 31 May, 2007; createdigitalmotion.com 12 March, 2009 ; geniusdv.com 1 June, 2007; scottsimmons.tv 28 September, 2009; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 31 May, 2007; createdigitalmotion.com 12 March, 2009 ; geniusdv.com 1 June, 2007; scottsimmons.tv 28 September, 2009; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-8495</link>
		<dc:creator>S Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-8495</guid>
		<description>Sure that&#039;s one way to do it but that can take a LOT of extra work depending on  how many clips you have to work with. Shorter story: Apple make smoothcam better and faster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure that&#8217;s one way to do it but that can take a LOT of extra work depending on  how many clips you have to work with. Shorter story: Apple make smoothcam better and faster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tylor</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-8494</link>
		<dc:creator>Tylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 04:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-8494</guid>
		<description>Short story. Export a managed project without (or with small) handles and none of the fat. Smoothcam the shorter clips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short story. Export a managed project without (or with small) handles and none of the fat. Smoothcam the shorter clips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-7667</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-7667</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows that story and passion are unimportant/completely irrelevant, Frank; You&#039;re just not mature enough to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that story and passion are unimportant/completely irrelevant, Frank; You&#8217;re just not mature enough to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Perrotto</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Perrotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-6076</guid>
		<description>Re: Maartai

So I guess David Fincher and Walter Murch are being laughed out of the industry... you&#039;re a jack-ass, typical response from a tech-head nerd who thinks it&#039;s the tools that make something great, not the people behind them. What was it that Coppola said? Oh, and Kubrick too - one day the so-called &#039;professionalism&#039; of filmmaking will be squashed forever and it will be a real art form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Maartai</p>
<p>So I guess David Fincher and Walter Murch are being laughed out of the industry&#8230; you&#8217;re a jack-ass, typical response from a tech-head nerd who thinks it&#8217;s the tools that make something great, not the people behind them. What was it that Coppola said? Oh, and Kubrick too &#8211; one day the so-called &#8216;professionalism&#8217; of filmmaking will be squashed forever and it will be a real art form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5793</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-5793</guid>
		<description>Steven, that&#039;s kinda what this whole blog is about. So tell us ... what&#039;s gonna come next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, that&#8217;s kinda what this whole blog is about. So tell us &#8230; what&#8217;s gonna come next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven S.</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5783</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 06:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-5783</guid>
		<description>FCP is setting a whole new revolution in post production. Your gonna love what apple does next...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCP is setting a whole new revolution in post production. Your gonna love what apple does next&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5595</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-5595</guid>
		<description>Hey great comment Karl. That&#039;s about the best I&#039;ve ever seen when comparing Avid and FCP in a more free-flowing, abstrack kinda way. That&#039;s almost worthy of a post on its own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey great comment Karl. That&#8217;s about the best I&#8217;ve ever seen when comparing Avid and FCP in a more free-flowing, abstrack kinda way. That&#8217;s almost worthy of a post on its own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-5584</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-5584</guid>
		<description>i started out on the AVID about 13 years ago and since then have been going back and forth between FCP and AVID depending on what the clients can afford.

technically, AVID is tits. she&#039;s solid, flexible, and broadcast industry standard more or less. tight, sexy EDLs and producers love to sound boss hissing into their cell phones &quot;steven, deal with that idiot DP youself, i&#039;m in the AVID suite and this is costing me $350 an hour, jerkface!&quot;. or something silly like that.

FCP is loose, funky in many areas, sloppy in the areas it&#039;s not funky, unstable and sort of schizo. producers in the FCP room get more creative, buy me the best coffee and have muffled phone converstaions like &quot;this render is taking forever, but i can&#039;t believe how whe saved the footage that idiot DP gave us!&quot;.

AVID gigs pay more, but by and large I actually enjoy my FCP projects. How many talking head corporate rhetoric pieces can you slice on and AVID before going brain dead and not caring anymore? For me, not many. How many zombie themed library commercials, blaxplotation valet training videos and performance art inside kinetic installations can i work and still stay interested? About ten years so far...

Comes down to personal preference, I think. AVID pays for my motorcycle and carbon fiber mountain bikes, but FCP makes me want to pedal fast and bunny hop into the suite.

My 2.97 cents.

-k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i started out on the AVID about 13 years ago and since then have been going back and forth between FCP and AVID depending on what the clients can afford.</p>
<p>technically, AVID is tits. she&#8217;s solid, flexible, and broadcast industry standard more or less. tight, sexy EDLs and producers love to sound boss hissing into their cell phones &#8220;steven, deal with that idiot DP youself, i&#8217;m in the AVID suite and this is costing me $350 an hour, jerkface!&#8221;. or something silly like that.</p>
<p>FCP is loose, funky in many areas, sloppy in the areas it&#8217;s not funky, unstable and sort of schizo. producers in the FCP room get more creative, buy me the best coffee and have muffled phone converstaions like &#8220;this render is taking forever, but i can&#8217;t believe how whe saved the footage that idiot DP gave us!&#8221;.</p>
<p>AVID gigs pay more, but by and large I actually enjoy my FCP projects. How many talking head corporate rhetoric pieces can you slice on and AVID before going brain dead and not caring anymore? For me, not many. How many zombie themed library commercials, blaxplotation valet training videos and performance art inside kinetic installations can i work and still stay interested? About ten years so far&#8230;</p>
<p>Comes down to personal preference, I think. AVID pays for my motorcycle and carbon fiber mountain bikes, but FCP makes me want to pedal fast and bunny hop into the suite.</p>
<p>My 2.97 cents.</p>
<p>-k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipe :)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-4366</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipe :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2007/06/01/smoothcam-is-smooth-but-slow/#comment-4366</guid>
		<description>Hey Maartai!

I can&#039;t say you are wrong, but I think you lack a little bit of perspective and understanding of the industry and the reality of things out there...

Most productions that are created, both in the creative-narrative and corporate-promo-advertising world, do not have nearly enough budget to rent 40 000$ editing rooms. 

Plus Apple users are not all kids whose parents have bought them a computer. You insult a lot of serious professionals by saying that. 

Furthermore, you are attacking the democratization of video making: how are people supposed to get started if, in the first place, they need at least a 40 000$ investment or need to get hired by a big company?

Come on! Don&#039;t be so frustrated: it&#039;s a new era and the pie is more divided, however more people get to be creative and live off their passion!

Cheers to all video makers out there, whatever your platform is!
Philippe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Maartai!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say you are wrong, but I think you lack a little bit of perspective and understanding of the industry and the reality of things out there&#8230;</p>
<p>Most productions that are created, both in the creative-narrative and corporate-promo-advertising world, do not have nearly enough budget to rent 40 000$ editing rooms. </p>
<p>Plus Apple users are not all kids whose parents have bought them a computer. You insult a lot of serious professionals by saying that. </p>
<p>Furthermore, you are attacking the democratization of video making: how are people supposed to get started if, in the first place, they need at least a 40 000$ investment or need to get hired by a big company?</p>
<p>Come on! Don&#8217;t be so frustrated: it&#8217;s a new era and the pie is more divided, however more people get to be creative and live off their passion!</p>
<p>Cheers to all video makers out there, whatever your platform is!<br />
Philippe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

