<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RED music videos and DNxHD 36</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/</link>
	<description>A few words about non-linear editing, filmmaking and more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: editmarx</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7792</link>
		<dc:creator>editmarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7792</guid>
		<description>Just started a feature and have been using the QT ref and DNXHD36 import from medium method.  The article is right.  Looks great, takes long.

Will be jumping on this tomorrow.  Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just started a feature and have been using the QT ref and DNXHD36 import from medium method.  The article is right.  Looks great, takes long.</p>
<p>Will be jumping on this tomorrow.  Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7789</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7789</guid>
		<description>Dylan, I&#039;ve found that for music videos I really like Avid&#039;s grouping methods much more than FCP. If I am just doing cuts and dissolves then I can work faster on Avid. FCP has worked great with RED but I always transcode and don&#039;t cut the proxies due to performance issues.. you just can&#039;t multiclip and edit with real speed. Other than that they are similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dylan, I&#8217;ve found that for music videos I really like Avid&#8217;s grouping methods much more than FCP. If I am just doing cuts and dissolves then I can work faster on Avid. FCP has worked great with RED but I always transcode and don&#8217;t cut the proxies due to performance issues.. you just can&#8217;t multiclip and edit with real speed. Other than that they are similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7788</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7788</guid>
		<description>rejean, I ran the proxies through Compressor to Avid&#039;s DNxHD 36 codec. It must be installed on your system but it&#039;s a free download from Avid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rejean, I ran the proxies through Compressor to Avid&#8217;s DNxHD 36 codec. It must be installed on your system but it&#8217;s a free download from Avid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7787</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7787</guid>
		<description>Gopal, I don&#039;t think there is a 720 DNxHD setting, at least I didn&#039;t see one. I went with the default DNxHD 36 settings which are 1080. They are really small files so drive space and playback shouldn&#039;t be an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gopal, I don&#8217;t think there is a 720 DNxHD setting, at least I didn&#8217;t see one. I went with the default DNxHD 36 settings which are 1080. They are really small files so drive space and playback shouldn&#8217;t be an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopal Balaji</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7777</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopal Balaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7777</guid>
		<description>Unable to find DNxHD 36 for 720p?

Missing Something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unable to find DNxHD 36 for 720p?</p>
<p>Missing Something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rejean</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7768</link>
		<dc:creator>rejean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7768</guid>
		<description>You wrote that you run the high quality reference files through compressor, but what codec/video settings are you exporting to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote that you run the high quality reference files through compressor, but what codec/video settings are you exporting to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Reeve</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Reeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7760</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate a bit on your FCP experience with RED? To be honest I\&#039;ve barely tried in FCP - when I did I found the performance to be greatly lacking, and had a render-tastic time.

I\&#039;ve been using Avid since then.

REDAlert (and line and rushes) now support DNxHD directly, although no option to pick datarate so 36 won\&#039;t be available. However (there had to be one) it requires a new version of the DNxHD Quicktime codec, which apparently hasn\&#039;t been released by Avid yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate a bit on your FCP experience with RED? To be honest I\&#8217;ve barely tried in FCP &#8211; when I did I found the performance to be greatly lacking, and had a render-tastic time.</p>
<p>I\&#8217;ve been using Avid since then.</p>
<p>REDAlert (and line and rushes) now support DNxHD directly, although no option to pick datarate so 36 won\&#8217;t be available. However (there had to be one) it requires a new version of the DNxHD Quicktime codec, which apparently hasn\&#8217;t been released by Avid yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Diamond</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/08/05/red-music-videos-and-dnxhd-36/comment-page-1/#comment-7758</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Diamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1116#comment-7758</guid>
		<description>We have also been doing the exact same thing at our house and i agree that it has been flawless so far. Also you dont need to compress the &quot;H&quot; proxies...use the &quot;M&quot; proxies since the H proxies arent true 4k files but double sized sized 2K files (not the same). We use the &quot;M&quot; proxies and the files are smaller and look just as good. especially if you arent finishing in the AVID.

Also we have finished in the avid using Magic Bullet Looks as our primary grader and let me tell you it is fantastic. Try taking a pass with it (assuming you have hi-res cross converst of your proxies DNxHD175 or higher) and see what you think. Pretty great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have also been doing the exact same thing at our house and i agree that it has been flawless so far. Also you dont need to compress the &#8220;H&#8221; proxies&#8230;use the &#8220;M&#8221; proxies since the H proxies arent true 4k files but double sized sized 2K files (not the same). We use the &#8220;M&#8221; proxies and the files are smaller and look just as good. especially if you arent finishing in the AVID.</p>
<p>Also we have finished in the avid using Magic Bullet Looks as our primary grader and let me tell you it is fantastic. Try taking a pass with it (assuming you have hi-res cross converst of your proxies DNxHD175 or higher) and see what you think. Pretty great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

