<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RED debate rages on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/</link>
	<description>A few words about non-linear editing, filmmaking and more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian vs Red at FreshDV</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian vs Red at FreshDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1308#comment-7921</guid>
		<description>[...] Simmons recently noted some criticism of the Red camera (well, a manifesto really) by director Rian Johnson. Rian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simmons recently noted some criticism of the Red camera (well, a manifesto really) by director Rian Johnson. Rian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7896</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1308#comment-7896</guid>
		<description>I have to roll my eyes when people say &quot;it&#039;s just a tool&quot;, like that evens everything out. In fact, there are technological breakthroughs that really do create a paradigm shift, and allow people to do important, impactful things they were never able to do before. Was the invention of the airplane &quot;just another transportation tool?&quot; What about the Model T, was that just another car? How about the Lisa/Mac graphical user interface revolution in 1983/84, were those models just another set of computers? Was the iPod just another music player--ie, different but no better or worse than a radio or tape? And I suppose the invention of the crossbow was just another bow-and-arrow. 

Please. 

The Red camera is not just another camera, guys. Maybe, being largely video editors, you don&#039;t have the requisite knowledge to recognize a major change in the camera world when you see it, but that doesn&#039;t change the fact that the Red camera really is a big leap. What&#039;s so special? In one model, we have: 

* Film-like resolution (at least, in the rough ballpark--how many $50K or even $100K cameras from Panasonic, Sony or JVC can do that?)
* 35mm shallow depth of field (ditto)
* Variable frame rates up to 120 fps (ditto)
* Raw 4:4:4 codec for unlimited color correction (ditto)
* Camera body for $17.5K (ditto)

The Red One introduced many many important firsts in a camera that almost every professional could afford to own. It really is a leap. Please give credit where it&#039;s due....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to roll my eyes when people say &#8220;it&#8217;s just a tool&#8221;, like that evens everything out. In fact, there are technological breakthroughs that really do create a paradigm shift, and allow people to do important, impactful things they were never able to do before. Was the invention of the airplane &#8220;just another transportation tool?&#8221; What about the Model T, was that just another car? How about the Lisa/Mac graphical user interface revolution in 1983/84, were those models just another set of computers? Was the iPod just another music player&#8211;ie, different but no better or worse than a radio or tape? And I suppose the invention of the crossbow was just another bow-and-arrow. </p>
<p>Please. </p>
<p>The Red camera is not just another camera, guys. Maybe, being largely video editors, you don&#8217;t have the requisite knowledge to recognize a major change in the camera world when you see it, but that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that the Red camera really is a big leap. What&#8217;s so special? In one model, we have: </p>
<p>* Film-like resolution (at least, in the rough ballpark&#8211;how many $50K or even $100K cameras from Panasonic, Sony or JVC can do that?)<br />
* 35mm shallow depth of field (ditto)<br />
* Variable frame rates up to 120 fps (ditto)<br />
* Raw 4:4:4 codec for unlimited color correction (ditto)<br />
* Camera body for $17.5K (ditto)</p>
<p>The Red One introduced many many important firsts in a camera that almost every professional could afford to own. It really is a leap. Please give credit where it&#8217;s due&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1308#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t make the &#039;Brick&#039; connection -- thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t make the &#8216;Brick&#8217; connection &#8212; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea D'Elena</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7872</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea D'Elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1308#comment-7872</guid>
		<description>I heartily agree, wether you&#039;re talking about a car or a camera, it&#039;s not the technology it&#039;s the person wielding it.  I also loooooved Brick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heartily agree, wether you&#8217;re talking about a car or a camera, it&#8217;s not the technology it&#8217;s the person wielding it.  I also loooooved Brick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GroovyBrent</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/09/25/the-red-debate-rages-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7871</link>
		<dc:creator>GroovyBrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1308#comment-7871</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re about to jump on the RED bandwagon, I have to keep reminding my staff (and myself!) that the RED is just a tool.  If you have a skilled user who knows how to use that tool, you can make great works of art.  Even our HVX200s (which have been workhorses for us for the last 3 years or so) have the ability to make stunning images in the right hands.  Debates like the ones you mention in this post can be a lot of fun, and interesting (as far as they go), but as you say, if the tool works for you, that&#039;s the one you should use.

Unless the tool is a Windows computer.  Then you&#039;re an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re about to jump on the RED bandwagon, I have to keep reminding my staff (and myself!) that the RED is just a tool.  If you have a skilled user who knows how to use that tool, you can make great works of art.  Even our HVX200s (which have been workhorses for us for the last 3 years or so) have the ability to make stunning images in the right hands.  Debates like the ones you mention in this post can be a lot of fun, and interesting (as far as they go), but as you say, if the tool works for you, that&#8217;s the one you should use.</p>
<p>Unless the tool is a Windows computer.  Then you&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

