<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking at Magic Bullet&#8217;s Steady</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/12/10/looking-at-magic-bullets-steady/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/12/10/looking-at-magic-bullets-steady/</link>
	<description>A few words about non-linear editing, filmmaking and more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editblog &#187; First footage from the GT35pro adapter</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/12/10/looking-at-magic-bullets-steady/comment-page-1/#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editblog &#187; First footage from the GT35pro adapter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1481#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>[...] rig good and steady so a good tripod is a must. You would think I would have learned my lesson with Magic Bullet Steady. It&#8217;s also hard to nail focus on a little flip-out camera monitor. You have to get the HV20 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rig good and steady so a good tripod is a must. You would think I would have learned my lesson with Magic Bullet Steady. It&#8217;s also hard to nail focus on a little flip-out camera monitor. You have to get the HV20 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2008/12/10/looking-at-magic-bullets-steady/comment-page-1/#comment-8046</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=1481#comment-8046</guid>
		<description>i was on the beta for steady adn while i didnt get to give as muc bfeedback as i wouldve liked (my own scheduling issues) everyone involved was trying to make it better than smoothcam. theres a time and a place for each tool to have its day.
steady  and most stabilizing sometimes seems to have a &quot;snorri cam&quot; effect where its repo&#039;ing around a fixed center. i think steady does a good job of reducing that as best it can and i guess it really comes down to garbage in garbage out at the end of the day but it&#039;ll def fix a ton of probs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was on the beta for steady adn while i didnt get to give as muc bfeedback as i wouldve liked (my own scheduling issues) everyone involved was trying to make it better than smoothcam. theres a time and a place for each tool to have its day.<br />
steady  and most stabilizing sometimes seems to have a &#8220;snorri cam&#8221; effect where its repo&#8217;ing around a fixed center. i think steady does a good job of reducing that as best it can and i guess it really comes down to garbage in garbage out at the end of the day but it&#8217;ll def fix a ton of probs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

