<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A real live LiveFont on CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2010/01/04/a-real-live-lifefont-on-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2010/01/04/a-real-live-lifefont-on-cnn/</link>
	<description>A few words about non-linear editing, filmmaking and more ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArKay</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2010/01/04/a-real-live-lifefont-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-8407</link>
		<dc:creator>ArKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=2144#comment-8407</guid>
		<description>@jcburns: god, I couldn&#039;t agree more!!! I still can&#039;t believe that there are actually people MOURNING the loss of the LT *APP*, which was in fact a multitude WORSE than the fonts themselves! A GUI nightmare! And they&#039;re all boo-hoo only because they&#039;re too chicken to actually evolve beyond the(ir) Known and use Motion if the so *have to* have a goofy LiveFont somewhere. Of the 52 I know of, there&#039;s barely ONE I can see using in a small small way without passing out with shame...

Ah well, a strange breed them editors (wannabe graphics people). LiveType is dead, for a good reason, good riddance. A nice (if not *great*, to a degree) idea with the worst possible execution. Too bad. It&#039;s actually the first time I&#039;ve even seen LiveType outside of cheesy wedding videos and/or local car dealer commercials... thank god. *shiver*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jcburns: god, I couldn&#8217;t agree more!!! I still can&#8217;t believe that there are actually people MOURNING the loss of the LT *APP*, which was in fact a multitude WORSE than the fonts themselves! A GUI nightmare! And they&#8217;re all boo-hoo only because they&#8217;re too chicken to actually evolve beyond the(ir) Known and use Motion if the so *have to* have a goofy LiveFont somewhere. Of the 52 I know of, there&#8217;s barely ONE I can see using in a small small way without passing out with shame&#8230;</p>
<p>Ah well, a strange breed them editors (wannabe graphics people). LiveType is dead, for a good reason, good riddance. A nice (if not *great*, to a degree) idea with the worst possible execution. Too bad. It&#8217;s actually the first time I&#8217;ve even seen LiveType outside of cheesy wedding videos and/or local car dealer commercials&#8230; thank god. *shiver*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcburns</title>
		<link>http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/2010/01/04/a-real-live-lifefont-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-8406</link>
		<dc:creator>jcburns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/?p=2144#comment-8406</guid>
		<description>There wasn&#039;t a designer within two miles of that edit room when the editor or reporter thought &quot;oh, this&#039;ll be cool.&quot; My stomach now feels like I&#039;ve downed 32 ounces of high-fructose corn syrup. Yeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There wasn&#8217;t a designer within two miles of that edit room when the editor or reporter thought &#8220;oh, this&#8217;ll be cool.&#8221; My stomach now feels like I&#8217;ve downed 32 ounces of high-fructose corn syrup. Yeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

